The deafening message of Trump"s Dinesh D"Souza pardon

President Trump announced Thursday that he would pardon Dinesh D"Souza, the loopy conservative operative who pleaded guilty to violating campaign finance law:





It is a spectacular abuse of the pardon power and a barely-veiled announcement that Trump will use that power to protect odious conservative criminals and undermine the Mueller investigation.


D"Souza is best known today for being too weird for polite company and incredibly racist — though his arguments and positions also have a strange tendency to flip around all over the place. As Alex Nichols writes, he got his start in politics with a deeply racist newspaper at Dartmouth, and then with moldy-oldie arguments about how slaves in the antebellum South were treated "pretty well." He got wide notoriety with one racist tirade after another against President Obama and blacks in general, leavened with stomach-churning fabrications about Obama"s mother.

In 2014, he pleaded guilty to a felony count of using two straw donors (one of them his mistress, in classic Conservatives Values fashion) to arrange $20,000 in illegal contributions to Republican New York Senate candidate Wendy Long in 2012. The remarkable thing about this is that not only was D"Souza stupid and careless enough to run afoul of the few remaining shreds of campaign finance law not yet torched by the Republican hack majority on the Supreme Court, but he was stupid enough to do it on behalf of a Republican in New York state in a presidential election year. Long lost to Kirsten Gillibrand by 46 points.


After getting out of eight months of community confinement, D"Souza veered to a new position, making a maudlin documentary claiming that actually, Democrats are the Real Racists. That is a pretty common conservative trope, but aside from being ludicrously dishonest, it was totally at odds with his previous position that American racism was not so bad. In the age of Trump, conservatives increasingly don"t even bother to make their propaganda internally consistent, but in any case D"Souza was soon up to his old tricks:





Trump has now exercised his pardon power on behalf of three big-time conservatives: Scooter Libby, Joe Arpaio, and D"Souza. The defense of racism and police brutality is a big factor here — indeed, not only is Arpaio a bilious racist, he was literally convicted for racist acts (namely, refusing to stop racially profiling Latinos). But probably more important now is the signal sent to all the people facing prosecution as part of the Mueller investigation or other probes into conservative crimes. Trump didn"t even bother to argue that D"Souza wasn"t guilty, just that he was "treated unfairly."


So if he"ll pardon Libby, Arpaio, and D"Souza, who won"t he pardon? Later Thursday it was reported he was also considering a pardon of Martha Stewart (convicted of insider trading) and former Illinois Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich (convicted on corruption charges) — a bizarre development, but likely explained by Blagojevich having appeared on The Apprentice, and Stewart having hosted an Apprentice spin-off.

The message is clear: Trump"s criminal associates get prime access to pardons. Several of those people, including Michael Flynn and George Papadapoulos, have already agreed to work with the Mueller investigation. But several others, like Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen, have not. It seems extremely likely that if they continue to refuse to cooperate and are convicted, then Trump will immediately pardon them. (They could probably increase their chances by publicly calling Obama a bunch of racial slurs on Fox News.)


So long as Trump remains in office, it seems beyond question that he will continue to abuse his powers of office to protect himself and his criminal associates from the rule of law, and that Republicans in Congress will continue to look the other way or actively enable him. If Trump is going to be reined in at all, Democrats are going to have to win some elections.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Logan was the most complained about film of 2017 for a stupid bloody reason

Image
Hugh Jackman"s ninth outing as Wolverine was the most complained about film of 2017 in cinemas in the UK. Logan opened to critical acclaim last year and was lauded by fans of the X-Men franchise for its ne0-noir, gritty portrayal of Wolverine and was Jackman"s last outing as the mutant we all love to love. Following the rip-roaring success of Deadpool, Fox gave the go-ahead to give the next wolverine outing an R-rating. This meant fans were finally going to get the Wolverine movie they"d always wanted. Violent and gritty, Logan was a valuable addition to the Marvel franchise, throwing around blood with almost as much reckless abandon as the word f*ck. It was perhaps Jackman"s best stint as Wolverine and thankfully helped to wash away some of the absolute horror that was X Men Origins: Wolverine (yeah, remember that absolute disaster?). Logan was the Wolverine film we"d all been waiting for ; as Old Man Logan, Jackman finally got to play Wolverine the way we wan...
Read more

"Johnny English Strikes Again" for more family-friendly fun

Image
When spy movies were a big thing back in the 1960s, occasionally someone would try to spoof the genre. This almost never worked, except for the TV series “Get Smart,” which had Mel Brooks as its guiding force. Maybe the spy satire needs time, because it wasn’t until the “Austin Powers” series, and two “OSS 117” films (starring “The Artist” Oscar-winner Jean Dujardin), that the 1960s spy movie got its proper send-up. Right in the midst of all that was Johnny English, the British secret agent played by Rowan Atkinson. In “Johnny English” (2003) and “Johnny English Reborn” (2011), Atkinson played a hapless Bond-wannabe who tried to stay relevant during the British Empire’s decline, but could barely stay out of his own way. Those movies were built around Atkinson (still best known as the accident-prone Mr. Bean), whose willingness to fall out of windows and slide down staircases while clad in a suit of armo...
Read more

Wedding guest stunned by groom"s rude reaction to gift

Image
Gift registries are one of the most divisive features of modern weddings, but they at least guarantee the marrying couple will be happy with what they receive. Or so one would assume, anyway. One disgruntled guest has shared the "cheeky" (read: rude) reaction a groom had to her wedding gift, and it"s truly jaw-dropping stuff. Writing on Mumsnet , the anonymous guest said she and her husband had ordered a $AUD125 gift from the Amazon wish list featured on the bride and groom"s wedding website, so were confident it would be received favourably. Arriving at the reception, however, it was apparent nobody else had brought physical presents. WATCH: The only gift Prince Harry and Meghan Markle want from their wedding guests. (Post continues.) "People kept saying "We just got them vouchers/money"," the woman recalls, adding that even the groom said he wasn"t expecting gifts. At the end of the night, theirs was still the only gift sitting by the card...
Read more